Eureka Springs, Arkansas · Saturday, March 20, 2010
[Masthead] Light Snow Fog/Mist ~ 32°F  
Winter Storm Warning
High: 39°F ~ Low: 31°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (2) Share link

Editorial: What Went Wrong?

Wednesday, November 25, 2009
On July 1, 2009 something went wrong. On that July day, City Council passed Ordinance 2106, "AN ORDINANCE WAIVING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPETITIVE BIDDING ON ACQUIRING COIN-OPERATED PARKING METERS FOR THE CITY OF EUREKA SPRINGS, ARKANSAS" that has resulted in a lawsuit against the mayor, the city council individually, and the city clerk, as filed for record on Nov. 12 in Circuit Court, Civil Division.

What went wrong? Ordinances are written by the handsful every year. They are read in public three times in three separate regularly scheduled Council meetings to make sure the public has an opportunity to study the issue and to comment on it, which is a right of the taxpayers, who foot the bills for the City, including this project that cost us $40,000.

The first red flag: This ordinance was written by the city attorney in 17 minutes during a special meeting, read three straight times by the Council at the same special meeting, which was poorly advertised, and was declared an emergency, which in this case, parking meters, violates state law 14-57-502. "Ordinances subject to initiative and referendum. Any municipal ordinance authorizing the installation of parking meters shall not be subject to an emergency clause. Nothing in this sub chapter shall limit the rights of the people under the Initiated and Referendum Amendment to the Constitution of the State of Arkansas."

As an aside, the illegal emergence clause was based on "Financial Health," a parody of the City's three cornerstones of responsibility: Public Safety; Public Health; and General Welfare.

The second red flag: The Historic District Commission was not consulted for approval of new construction in the Historic District, as prescribed by City regulations. The Planning Commission's review, as mandated by the City for new construction in Zone C-1 was also ignored. These two commissions' authorities are mandatory for each and every one of us; the City is no exception.

The Third Red flag: The meter company that was awarded the contract, without competitive bidding, has been doing business with Eureka for 13 years. Our city government is staffed by honest people -- elected, paid and volunteers. Some of them are our friends and neighbors, however a stranger might feel uncomfortable about this bid.

The fourth red flag: A petition for a special election "For" or "Against" this ordinance was signed by well over 100 legal voters, was certified by the City Clerk, but was refused an election date by the City Council without consulting the Carroll County Election Commission, thereby refusing a Constitutional right for redress of a grievance, which violates state law 14-57-502. "Ordinances subject to initiative and referendum. Any municipal ordinance authorizing the installation of parking meters shall not be subject to an emergency clause. Nothing in this sub chapter shall limit the rights of the people under the Initiated and Referendum Amendment to the Constitution of the State of Arkansas."

The fifth red flag: All of these red flags, these warning signs, went without appropriate consideration by the City despite newspaper coverage, including this newspaper and the Arkansas-Democrat Gazette.

So, what went wrong? Apparently there has been a total breakdown in communication between the City and its constituents, and now we, all of us, are left to the tender mercy of the American judicial system.

This just in.

"There will be a special City Council meeting at 8:30 a.m., Monday, Nov. 30 in the mayor's office in the Eureka Springs City Hall. The meeting is regarding removing the requirements of paying the parking meters on Spring St. and Main St. from Dec. 1 -- 31, 2009."

The irony here is that the city based its emergency clause on the need to immediately buy and install the meters because a 30-day wait would cost the city thousands of dollars.

-- Bill Earngey


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on lovelycitizen.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

I do believe most everyone has read your opinion on this several times...not only as an editorial, but in your column "Out of Arkansas". You haven't written anything but your opinion on ES in your OOA column for weeks and weeks. Kinda Johnny-One-Note. Frankly, I'm a little tired of your opinion.

-- Posted by Kaye Miller on Thu, Nov 26, 2009, at 2:54 PM

Tell ya what, Bill, why don't you get together with your little cadre and come up with some dollars, oh say, ten grand each, which you will then donate to the City of Eureka Springs, YEARLY, to help ensure there is no budgetary shortfall--and who knows, maybe even an excess of funds. Then I'll listen to your bellyaching about god-d**n parking meters. Hell, I'll even sign a petition to get rid of them. Meanwhile, as one who supports Eureka Springs financially in numerous ways, donations, shopping, parking meters, etc. my advice is simple and succinct: either put up or shut up.

-- Posted by mrbliss on Sun, Nov 29, 2009, at 2:01 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.