Eureka Springs, Arkansas · Sunday, March 21, 2010
[Masthead] Light Snow ~ 32°F  
Winter Storm Warning
High: 35°F ~ Low: 30°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (1) Share link

Election Commission nixes HI poll for millage vote

Wednesday, December 9, 2009 ~ Updated 12:48 PM
By Anna Mathews

BERRYVILLE -- During a short meeting on Nov. 20, the Carroll County Election Commission denied a formal request from the Eureka Springs School District for multiple polling sites for its special millage election on Feb. 9, 2010.

District Superintendent Wayne Carr requested two polling sites, one in Eureka Springs and the other at the Holiday Island Clubhouse, to "allow voters to conveniently vote in Eureka Springs or at Holiday Island," he said.

Carr appeared before the commission earlier in November, at the commission's request, to discuss the proposal, which had surfaced at a building committee meeting.

That committee is a volunteer group comprised of district patrons responsible for promoting passage of the increase to pay for a new high school.

Carr said they thought additional sites would make it easier for people to vote.

Pivotal opportunity

In his formal request to the commission dated Nov. 13, Carr wrote, "My intent is to give every school district patron the best opportunity possible to vote on this matter. This is a pivotal decision for the Eureka Springs School District and for the community, and it is important that we maximize voter participation concerning this issue. I sincerely believe that the additional polling site would afford many more of our citizens a greater opportunity to express their opinions on the proposal to build a new high school complex."

A 1.98 mil increase question will be on the ballot to pay for a new high school.

According to election commission records, the last time Eureka patrons were asked to approve a millage increase of 2.45 mil in September, 2003, only four percent of the district's 5,610 voters turned out to cast ballots. At that time, the increase passed with 120 voting yes and 84 no.

A swift denial

Election Commissioners David Hoover, Joe Goforth and Levi Phillips were swift with their denial. Phillips said "the request has been discussed enough, and he knows our reasons."

Those reasons, they agreed, include the potential for confusion among voters as to where they should vote, the potential for double voting, and the potential for setting a precedent.

Phillips said at a previous meeting that other school districts had made the same request in the past, and they were denied. He pointed out that many other school district patrons across the county had to drive much further to cast votes than those in the Eureka district.

'Push early voting'

At that time, he suggested to Carr that he push early voting at both the Eureka Springs and Berryville courthouses, saying "early voting is the way to work an election. Early voting is the key."

In response to the commission's denial, Carr issued this statement:

"I believe this decision will hinder many of our citizens from voting in the Feb. 9 election, especially if the weather is bad on that day. It is my contention that we should make voting as convenient as possible."


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on lovelycitizen.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Election Commissioners David Hoover, Joe Goforth and Levi Phillips were swift with their denial.

******************

Apparently they have not heard of Democracy! A sure way to guarantee passage is not to provide voting sites for all people to vote. I wonder the constitutionality of this decision by denying seniors, handicapped, and the many who would not only have transportation problems but also the limited parking. To base a decision on voter turnout in 2003 would indicate questionable reasoning. Another indication of where Carroll County enjoys the tax dollars H.I. provides, but does not want to provide the service.

-- Posted by Concerned Person on Thu, Dec 10, 2009, at 9:47 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.