'Open carry gun walk' scheduled here - Act 746 advocates plan to gather in Eureka Springs on March 29

Thursday, March 6, 2014

A group of advocates for the open carry gun laws have planned to equip themselves with a sidearm enjoy and a normal day of dining and shopping in the city on Saturday, March 29.

"It is not a march, it is not a demonstration," said Marti Suchsland, event organizer. "We are there for an open carry walk and to educate people. We will be eating lunch in Eureka Springs and then do some shopping and just carrying on like normal people."

The group, Northwest 746, plans to meet near Basin Park and walk around the city, but they will not enter any building or place that prohibits carrying firearms, such as government buildings or private businesses with warning signs, Suchsland said.

"People carry their weapons in secure holsters, and they are never taken out of their holsters, unless of course there is an incident and that has not happened yet, and we don't want that to happen," she said.

She also said she has gotten permission from Eureka Springs police and that law enforcement officers often accompany the group on their walks.

Police Chief Earl Hyatt said he has heard of the group and their intentions, but did not know any hard details on their plans. He added that he does not believe carrying a handgun is a punishable offense, unless someone commits a crime with it, or has the intent to do so. He also said that anyone could openly carry a rifle or shotgun and there are no laws prohibiting it, but a handgun is a different classification of weapon.

Northwest 746 is affiliated with the Patriots of Act 746, said group member Janis-Marie Horsley. The group believes that the 2013 ArkansasAct 746 allows citizens who legally own a firearm to openly carry it as well.

Horsley classified three different terms for carrying firearms. The first is constitutional carry, meaning that anyone who can own a gun can carry it openly or concealed. The second is open carry, meaning -- with a license -- anyone can carry a handgun openly or concealed. The third is concealed carry, meaning only licensed carriers can legally carry their weapons secreted on their person. She also said she would prefer a constitutional carry law, though her group advocates for an open carry.

Suchsland has been on three of the organization's 30 open carry or constitutional carry walks, and they have had no incidents, she said. Their first walk was in Fort Smith and their next one is scheduled for Saturday, March 1 in Fayetteville.

"As people were added across the state, we picked and chose reliable people to organize local groups with support from the main group," Gary Epperson, creator of Patriots of Act 746, stated in correspondence. "We are not a protest group, however with Attorney General McDaniel completely avoiding the entire changes in the law, we were not going to allow the state to use bully tactics to suppress the legislator's intent."

Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel wrote a legal opinion stating his interpretation of the recent act did not permit open carry.

"I do not interpret Act 746 as authorizing so-called open carry," McDaniel wrote. "It is my opinion that Act 746 does not itself permit a person to possess a handgun outside of his or her vehicle or other mode of transportation while on a journey outside his or her county of residence."

He continued to write that the act allows people to carry weapons in their vehicles when on the legal definition of a journey, which is a trip outside of a person's county of residence. It also changes the mental state required to support a conviction for carrying a weapon. The weapon carrier must have the intent to use the weapon illegally if they are to be convicted of any crime for carrying it.

However, others have different interpretations, including a law professor, student and attorney.

"Last year, the Arkansas legislature passed a new gun bill that supposedly made only technical changes but may, in fact, have legalized carrying a gun, openly or concealed, without a license," wrote Laurent Sacharoff, associate professor of law at the University of Arkansas, and Jacob Worlow, candidate for juris doctor at the university. "The result was likely unintended by most of the legislature or the governor, who signed the bill, but the language seems to point in that direction. In fact, many prosecutors including our prosecutor here in Washington County have interpreted the statute basically to have legalized carrying a gun in almost all circumstances."

Attorney Whitfield Hyman, from King Law Offices, also disagrees with the attorney general. On a blog on his employer's website, he stated his opinion with the disclaimer that it was not legal advice and for educational purposes only, and that the governor, state police and multiple county sheriffs had contrary positions to his interpretation.

"The real expansions have taken place under Section 2 of Act 746, not Section 1 where the changes to the journey clause were made," Hyman wrote. "Section 2 of Act 746 amends 5-73-120 which prohibits carrying a weapon. To be convicted under this statute, the prosecutor must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the defendant possessed a handgun [or any other weapon mentioned in the statute] with a purpose to attempt to unlawfully employ the handgun against a person. If one of those elements is not met, then you cannot be convicted of carrying a weapon."

Northwest 746 restricts its membership to individuals without a history of mental problems or felony criminal charges, Suchsland said. If anyone wanted to join the group, he or she would have to be vetted and invited. But group members encourage people who want to walk and carry a sidearm or approach them to ask a question to do so.

"We want to grow slowly and carefully," Suchsland said about acquiring membership to Northwest 746. "But anybody can come and walk the streets of Eureka Springs; we are not anything special, we are just a group of organized people."

She added that anyone in the group or not who is arrested is on their own and acting unlawfully and not cooperating with the police is not endorsed by the group. She also said she is aware the presence of guns, even secured in holsters, is enough to threaten some people.

But, she continued, that fear is something they will have to deal with because it is her Second Amendment right to carry a weapon.

View 5 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Gee, it seems our fine legislature and governor pay a lot of attention to the bills they sign. Unintended consequences?

    -- Posted by rockpilefarmer on Fri, Mar 7, 2014, at 7:30 PM
  • Here is a chance to show that Eureka Springs is a truly special place. There is no such thing as "selective diversity" Its time to walk the talk. You cant have it both ways. You cant be all about diversity except when its something you don't agree with. Putting up signs in the windows of businesses that say no gays....whoops i mean no gun carriers allowed would completely smack of hypocrisy! Their in your face gun carrying is akin to the PDA's that are done at basin park. Its in your face and meant to be so deal with it. Probably not the most endearing way to win someone over to your way of thinking. Funny how things change when the shoe is on the other foot now isn't it? Any way, kudos to them for finding the most tolerant little town in the Ozarks to stand up for their rights. I hope that tolerance doesn't prove to be one big phony charade!

    -- Posted by Blue crazy on Sat, Mar 15, 2014, at 6:28 PM
  • UNINTENDED? I think not. The author of the bill had intended this from the beginning. Here is a letter from Arkansas State Representative Denny Altes, who wrote and sponsored ACT 746:

    Open Carry has always been the law in Arkansas since at least the 1800s. When most people walked out their front door, they assumed they were on a "journey" or going hunting, and thousands open carried for over a century. "Journey" was not defined.

    It was against the law to conceal a weapon or gun. So, for well over

    a hundred years you had to open carry. If you put your gun in your glove box or under your seat, or under your clothes you were breaking the law. You had to carry your gun so that it was plainly visible on your body or on the seat of your car or on the dash (According

    to A.C.A. 5-73-120).

    Then, in 1997, Senator Bill Walters past the Concealed Carry law (Ark. Code

    Ann. 5-73-301 -- 323), which is a totally different section of code addressing a different issue.

    In 2011, I had heard many different discussions on carrying in Arkansas,

    and I wanted to clarify the law, especially Section 120. I asked the State Police lawyer to help me. We spent a lot of time coming up with a bill to please everyone. The people teaching classes for Concealed Carry didn't

    want the law clarified because it would cut into their livelihood and also the State Police would take a revenue cut on the money from people buying licenses. So, in the end, my bill passed the House but failed in the

    Senate at the end of the session.

    In 2013, I started earlier with the same bill, but the State Police had

    changed their mind on a few things. So, we wound-up

    with a totally different bill. Also, the University

    System wanted me to exclude their campuses.

    We had several meetings with the Sherriff's Association, the Chiefs

    of Police Association, the Prosecutors' Association,

    and the State Police. The old code was written so

    there were many defenses to carrying a weapon. So, I asked why not make it a right with exceptions. This met with approval from everyone. It seems that it is two sides of the same coin.

    So, we didn't really change the law, we only clarified that

    it is a right to keep and bear arms according to the Second

    Amendment of our Constitution (According to Webster's

    "bear" means "to carry").

    To keep the city of Mountain Home out of costly litigation it would be best to follow the law.

    -- Posted by CourageousLion on Sun, Mar 16, 2014, at 10:43 AM
  • Well written, thank you Lion.

    -- Posted by Blue crazy on Sun, Mar 16, 2014, at 11:48 PM
  • Please folks of Eureka Springs don't show the rest of the country that you struggle with hoplophobic attitudes!

    -- Posted by Blue crazy on Mon, Mar 17, 2014, at 1:09 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: